| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700 vs i5-10200H


Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
September 2016
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
260.38k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.7k
26.37k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
23.7k
23.91k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.46k
5.57k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.48k
11.68k (x1.02)
TOTAL
67.33k
67.53k (x1)

Multithread

i7-7700

i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
115.97k
114.08k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
114.71k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.28k
27.33k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
4.25k (x0.62)
TOTAL
257.52k
260.38k (x1.01)

Performance/W
i7-7700
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1784 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1668 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
3962 points/W
7439 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6356 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5643 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2733 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
16032 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4