Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
870f10
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2016
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.23k
4.2k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
16.76k
17.36k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
7.5k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.23k
23.79k (x1.95)
TOTAL
38.64k
52.85k (x1.37)
Multithread
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
16.71k
22.11k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
73.1k
108.04k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.76k
56.81k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.12k
36.39k (x5.11)
TOTAL
122.68k
223.36k (x1.82)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.33k
15.38k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.94k
21.94k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.85k
7.97k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.52k
24.76k (x1.98)
TOTAL
55.64k
70.05k (x1.26)
Multithread
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
61.73k
96.91k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
99.91k
135.12k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.03k
70.39k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.28k
56.43k (x6.08)
TOTAL
197.96k
358.85k (x1.81)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
15.04k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
23.41k
20.95k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
8.57k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.07k
21.71k (x1.96)
TOTAL
55.69k
66.27k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
62.68k
94.36k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
105.24k
141.73k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.35k
69.38k (x2.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.79k
32.72k (x5.65)
TOTAL
200.07k
338.19k (x1.69)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
26.7k
16.04k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
23.7k
24.47k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.46k
8.38k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.48k
21.66k (x1.89)
TOTAL
67.33k
70.55k (x1.05)
Multithread
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
115.97k
113.63k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
143.55k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.28k
63.84k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
27.34k (x3.99)
TOTAL
257.52k
348.35k (x1.35)
Performance/W
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1784 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1668 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
3962 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7700
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6356 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5643 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2733 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16032 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4