| | | | | | |

Core i7-7700 vs Ryzen 5 3400G


Description
The i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7700 gets a score of 257.5 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700 is 1.3 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2016
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
67.33k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
257.52k points
200.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7700
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
26.7k
14.58k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
23.7k
23.98k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.46k
5.35k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.48k
6.34k (x0.55)
TOTAL
67.33k
50.25k (x0.75)

Multithread

i7-7700

3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
115.97k
57.37k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
108.43k
107.03k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.28k
28.9k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.85k
7.05k (x1.03)
TOTAL
257.52k
200.34k (x0.78)

Performance/W
i7-7700
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1784 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1668 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
404 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
3962 points/W
3082 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7700
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6356 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5643 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1300 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2733 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
16032 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4