Core i7-7660U vs i5-10300H
Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.9 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.9 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
27.14k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
24.75k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
5.73k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
11.84k (x1.08)
TOTAL
57.46k
69.47k (x1.21)
Multithread
i7-7660U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
105.77k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
107.47k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
24.82k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
8.02k (x0.48)
TOTAL
132.81k
246.07k (x1.85)
Performance/W
i7-7660U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4