Core i7-7660U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.5 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.5 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
198.27k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
14.2k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
23.23k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
5.35k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
5.18k (x0.47)
TOTAL
57.46k
47.96k (x0.83)
Multithread
i7-7660U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
58.24k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
105.72k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
28.73k (x2.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
5.59k (x0.33)
TOTAL
132.81k
198.27k (x1.49)
Performance/W
i7-7660U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4