| | | | | | |

Core i7-7660U vs Ryzen 3 1200


Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 1200 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the 1200 gets 117.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7660U is 1.1 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
800f11
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
37.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
117.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
11.73k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
18.85k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
4.22k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
2.76k (x0.25)
TOTAL
57.46k
37.55k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-7660U

1200
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
38.56k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
62.21k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
13.7k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
3.33k (x0.2)
TOTAL
132.81k
117.81k (x0.89)

Performance/W
i7-7660U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
593 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
957 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
211 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
1812 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
1200
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
3449 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5544 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
1242 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
11045 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4