| | | | | | |

Core i7-7660U vs i3-12100F


Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 2.6 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
90675
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
39.54k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
23.79k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
11.96k (x2.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
13.52k (x1.24)
TOTAL
57.46k
88.81k (x1.55)

Multithread

i7-7660U

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
148k (x2.61)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
123.08k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
52.73k (x4.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
16.67k (x0.99)
TOTAL
132.81k
340.49k (x2.56)

Performance/W
i7-7660U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4