Core i7-7660U vs i7-1195G7
Description
The i7-7660U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.8 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7660U gets a score of 132.8 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.8 times faster than the i7-7660U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
806c2
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.46k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
132.81k points
239.58k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7660U
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.46k
30.89k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
19.29k
25.57k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.77k
10.64k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.94k
15.66k (x1.43)
TOTAL
57.46k
82.77k (x1.44)
Multithread
i7-7660U
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
56.67k
96.34k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
46.95k
95.75k (x2.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.36k
32.29k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.84k
15.2k (x0.9)
TOTAL
132.81k
239.58k (x1.8)
Performance/W
i7-7660U
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3778 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3130 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
824 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1122 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
8854 points/W
8557 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7660U
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5614 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4823 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1193 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2735 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
14365 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4