| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 2.9 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
50654
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
3k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
12.29k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
3.64k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
6.55k (x0.74)
TOTAL
29.09k
25.46k (x0.88)

Multithread

i7-7560U

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
20.42k (x3.22)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
95.83k (x3.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
30.88k (x3.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
9.7k (x0.66)
TOTAL
59.51k
156.83k (x2.64)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
18.78k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
16.25k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
3.99k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
6.8k (x0.88)
TOTAL
48.16k
45.82k (x0.95)

Multithread

i7-7560U

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
133.55k (x3.41)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
108.43k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
30.02k (x3.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
9.48k (x0.86)
TOTAL
97.27k
281.48k (x2.89)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4