| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i9-7980XE


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-7980XE is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i9-7980XE gets 1223.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-7980XE is 12.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
50654
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Skylake-X
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
2/4
18/36
TDP
15 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2017
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
76.43k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
1223.79k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.89k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
19.98k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
6.14k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
9.81k (x1.1)
TOTAL
29.09k
40.82k (x1.4)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
79.8k (x12.59)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
372.72k (x12.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
121.42k (x13.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
26.48k (x1.8)
TOTAL
59.51k
600.43k (x10.09)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
31.16k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
28.13k (x1.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
6.65k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
10.5k (x1.35)
TOTAL
48.16k
76.43k (x1.59)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
560.19k (x14.3)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
516.97k (x13.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
123.94k (x13.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
22.69k (x2.07)
TOTAL
97.27k
1223.79k (x12.58)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
3395 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
751 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
137 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
7417 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i9-7980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
7081 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
6392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1512 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2386 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
17371 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4