| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i9-10900K


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 7 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0655
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
10/20
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
19.5k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
28.01k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
7.45k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
15.82k (x1.77)
TOTAL
45.24k
70.79k (x1.56)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
194.49k (x8.44)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
312.59k (x7.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
89.14k (x8.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
12.58k (x0.83)
TOTAL
88.42k
608.81k (x6.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
32.67k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
28.49k (x1.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
6.53k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
12.72k (x1.64)
TOTAL
48.16k
80.41k (x1.67)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
307.39k (x7.85)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
298.47k (x7.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
72.94k (x8.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
6.85k (x0.62)
TOTAL
97.27k
685.65k (x7.05)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4