| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i7-8086K


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-8086K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i7-8086K gets 352.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-8086K is 3.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906ea
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2018
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
72.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
352.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
28.74k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
25.31k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.78k (x1.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
13.12k (x1.69)
TOTAL
48.16k
72.95k (x1.51)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
160.53k (x4.1)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
147.29k (x3.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
35.65k (x4.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
8.92k (x0.81)
TOTAL
97.27k
352.4k (x3.62)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1690 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1550 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
375 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3709 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i7-8086K
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
5748 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5063 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2624 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
14590 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4