Core i7-7560U vs i7-4765T
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-4765T is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-4765T is 1.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
306c3
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
134.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
15.61k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
8.8k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
3.58k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
3.33k (x0.43)
TOTAL
48.16k
31.31k (x0.65)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
66k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
43.27k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
17.39k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
7.88k (x0.72)
TOTAL
97.27k
134.53k (x1.38)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1236 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
497 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3844 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
5203 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
2932 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
1110 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
10438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4