Core i7-7560U vs i5-9500T
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 2.8 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-9500T gets 274 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 2.8 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
906ea
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
61.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
274.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
3.73k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
15.41k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4.62k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
10.59k (x1.19)
TOTAL
29.09k
34.35k (x1.18)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
20.82k (x3.29)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
85.48k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
23.21k (x2.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
4.11k (x0.28)
TOTAL
59.51k
133.63k (x2.25)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
12.4k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
18.41k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.69k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
10.48k (x1.17)
TOTAL
45.24k
45.98k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
74.86k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
105.88k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
22.34k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
4.01k (x0.26)
TOTAL
88.42k
207.08k (x2.34)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
13.46k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
20.21k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
4.72k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
10.25k (x1.14)
TOTAL
46.02k
48.64k (x1.06)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
74.65k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
110.86k (x2.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
22.08k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
4.12k (x0.28)
TOTAL
89.03k
211.7k (x2.38)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
24.5k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
21.41k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
4.82k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
10.73k (x1.38)
TOTAL
48.16k
61.46k (x1.28)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
134.63k (x3.44)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
113.61k (x2.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
21.71k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
4.07k (x0.37)
TOTAL
97.27k
274.02k (x2.82)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
3846 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
3246 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
620 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
7829 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-9500T
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5786 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2901 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
16610 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4