| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i5-7200U


Description
Both models i7-7560U and i5-7200U are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7200U is 1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
806e9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2017
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
97.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
3.15k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
12.85k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4.14k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
5.21k (x0.59)
TOTAL
29.09k
25.36k (x0.87)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
6.28k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
29.27k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
9.31k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
4.71k (x0.32)
TOTAL
59.51k
49.56k (x0.83)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
11.39k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
16.47k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.36k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
5.21k (x0.58)
TOTAL
45.24k
37.43k (x0.83)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
23.57k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
37.4k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
10.15k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
4.78k (x0.31)
TOTAL
88.42k
75.9k (x0.86)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
11.36k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
17.26k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
4.03k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
4.77k (x0.53)
TOTAL
46.02k
37.42k (x0.81)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
24.08k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
41.23k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
10.19k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
4.72k (x0.32)
TOTAL
89.03k
80.22k (x0.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
19.34k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
17.47k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
4.08k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
4.04k (x0.52)
TOTAL
48.16k
44.94k (x0.93)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
42.86k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
41.3k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
9.69k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
3.68k (x0.34)
TOTAL
97.27k
97.52k (x1)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
6501 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4