| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i5-3470S


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-3470S is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 89 k points while the i5-3470S gets 93.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3470S is 1 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306a9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
31.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
93.35k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
11.41k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
10.98k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
4.31k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
4.66k (x0.52)
TOTAL
46.02k
31.35k (x0.68)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
35.73k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
36k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
14.48k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
7.14k (x0.48)
TOTAL
89.03k
93.35k (x1.05)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
1533 points/W
550 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
554 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
661 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
5935 points/W
1436 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-3470S
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
3168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5268 points/GHz
3050 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1092 points/GHz
1197 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1293 points/GHz
TOTAL
12111 points/GHz
8708 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4