| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i5-2320


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-2320 is based on Sandy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 89 k points while the i5-2320 gets 66.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7560U is 1.3 times faster than the i5-2320 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
206a7
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Sandy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
24.01k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
66.48k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
8.88k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
7.84k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
3.79k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
3.51k (x0.39)
TOTAL
46.02k
24.01k (x0.52)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
27.98k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
24.48k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
11.42k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
2.6k (x0.17)
TOTAL
89.03k
66.48k (x0.75)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
1533 points/W
295 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
258 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
661 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
5935 points/W
700 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-2320
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
2689 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5268 points/GHz
2375 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1092 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1063 points/GHz
TOTAL
12111 points/GHz
7277 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4