Core i7-7560U vs i5-10400T
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 3.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
14.19k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
4.62k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
11.03k (x1.24)
TOTAL
29.09k
33.84k (x1.16)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
22.77k (x3.59)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
96.59k (x3.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
31.65k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
2.45k (x0.17)
TOTAL
59.51k
153.46k (x2.58)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
12.61k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
17.94k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
4.83k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
10.81k (x1.21)
TOTAL
45.24k
46.19k (x1.02)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
74.62k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
119.63k (x2.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
32.65k (x3.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
2.52k (x0.17)
TOTAL
88.42k
229.42k (x2.59)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
12.5k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
19.05k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
4.72k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
10.3k (x1.15)
TOTAL
46.02k
46.57k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
74.58k (x3.24)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
126.96k (x3.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
31.76k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
2.5k (x0.17)
TOTAL
89.03k
235.8k (x2.65)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
22k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
19.98k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
4.57k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
11.31k (x1.46)
TOTAL
48.16k
57.85k (x1.2)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
136.69k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
135.25k (x3.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
32.76k (x3.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
2.48k (x0.23)
TOTAL
97.27k
307.18k (x3.16)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4