| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs i5-10300H


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 2.5 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0652
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
15.65k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
23.13k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
5.66k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
11.43k (x1.27)
TOTAL
46.02k
55.87k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
26.77k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
43.81k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
10.17k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
11.91k (x0.8)
TOTAL
89.03k
92.66k (x1.04)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
27.14k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
24.75k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.73k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
11.84k (x1.53)
TOTAL
48.16k
69.47k (x1.44)

Multithread

i7-7560U

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
105.77k (x2.7)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
107.47k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
24.82k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
8.02k (x0.73)
TOTAL
97.27k
246.07k (x2.53)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4