Core i7-7560U vs i3-10105
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 2.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 2.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
a0653
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.5k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
18.39k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
5.78k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
8.3k (x0.93)
TOTAL
29.09k
36.97k (x1.27)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
16.13k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
75.62k (x2.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
27.88k (x3.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
3.57k (x0.24)
TOTAL
59.51k
123.2k (x2.07)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
16.19k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
23.07k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
6.04k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
8.46k (x0.95)
TOTAL
45.24k
53.77k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
57.59k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
100.63k (x2.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
28.59k (x2.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
3.56k (x0.23)
TOTAL
88.42k
190.38k (x2.15)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
16.11k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
24.12k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
5.71k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
7.89k (x0.88)
TOTAL
46.02k
53.83k (x1.17)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
58.25k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
105.73k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
27.8k (x2.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
3.51k (x0.24)
TOTAL
89.03k
195.29k (x2.19)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
28.9k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
25.85k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.88k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
8.29k (x1.07)
TOTAL
48.16k
68.92k (x1.43)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
111.69k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
110.23k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
28.45k (x3.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
3.56k (x0.32)
TOTAL
97.27k
253.93k (x2.61)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4