| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs Celeron N5105


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the N5105 is based on Tremont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 88.4 k points while the N5105 gets 64.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7560U is 1.4 times faster than the N5105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906c0
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Jasper Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
1536 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
27.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
64.09k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
9.83k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
9.74k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.65k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
3.88k (x0.43)
TOTAL
45.24k
27.1k (x0.6)

Multithread

i7-7560U

N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
25.04k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
24.7k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
9.29k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
5.06k (x0.33)
TOTAL
88.42k
64.09k (x0.72)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
1536 points/W
2504 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2671 points/W
2470 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
672 points/W
929 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1016 points/W
506 points/W
TOTAL
5894 points/W
6409 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
N5105
Test#1 (Integers)
3364 points/GHz
3388 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4946 points/GHz
3358 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1241 points/GHz
1259 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2355 points/GHz
1338 points/GHz
TOTAL
11905 points/GHz
9344 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4