| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 9 5900HS


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900HS is 4.5 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
a50f00
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2017
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
434.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
21.2k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
25k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
11.44k (x3.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
24.22k (x3.12)
TOTAL
48.16k
81.87k (x1.7)

Multithread

i7-7560U

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
145.13k (x3.71)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
198.36k (x5.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
85.67k (x9.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
5.79k (x0.53)
TOTAL
97.27k
434.96k (x4.47)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
12427 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4