Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 7.8 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 7.8 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
870f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
756.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.46k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
18.46k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
8.05k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
23.71k (x2.67)
TOTAL
29.09k
54.68k (x1.88)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
52.65k (x8.31)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
265.41k (x8.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
140.78k (x15.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
46.91k (x3.19)
TOTAL
59.51k
505.76k (x8.5)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
17.35k (x1.36)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
25.87k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
8.72k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
27.86k (x3.11)
TOTAL
45.24k
79.8k (x1.76)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
201.57k (x8.75)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
284.41k (x7.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
145.16k (x14.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
100.56k (x6.6)
TOTAL
88.42k
731.7k (x8.28)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
16.95k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
25.37k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
9.23k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
24.83k (x2.77)
TOTAL
46.02k
76.38k (x1.66)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
196.31k (x8.54)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
290.5k (x7.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
143.95k (x14.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
64.92k (x4.36)
TOTAL
89.03k
695.69k (x7.81)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
16.73k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
24.74k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
8.82k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
22.22k (x2.87)
TOTAL
48.16k
72.51k (x1.51)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
248.24k (x6.34)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
309.66k (x8.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
140.01k (x15.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
58.39k (x5.32)
TOTAL
97.27k
756.3k (x7.78)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4