Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 5.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 5.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
870f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
17.57k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
27.38k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
9.35k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
23.9k (x3.08)
TOTAL
48.16k
78.2k (x1.62)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
176.08k (x4.5)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
219.88k (x5.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
100k (x11.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
12.93k (x1.18)
TOTAL
97.27k
508.89k (x5.23)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4