Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 3.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
860f01
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
15.48k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
22.82k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
8.63k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
7.17k (x0.92)
TOTAL
48.16k
54.11k (x1.12)
Multithread
i7-7560U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
117.98k (x3.01)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
146.43k (x3.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
65.54k (x7.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
4.77k (x0.44)
TOTAL
97.27k
334.72k (x3.44)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4