Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 5 3600
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3600 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
870f10
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2017
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
348.35k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
4.2k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
17.36k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
7.5k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
23.79k (x2.68)
TOTAL
29.09k
52.85k (x1.82)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
22.11k (x3.49)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
108.04k (x3.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
56.81k (x6.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
36.39k (x2.47)
TOTAL
59.51k
223.36k (x3.75)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
15.38k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
21.94k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
7.97k (x1.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
24.76k (x2.77)
TOTAL
45.24k
70.05k (x1.55)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
96.91k (x4.21)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
135.12k (x3.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
70.39k (x6.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
56.43k (x3.7)
TOTAL
88.42k
358.85k (x4.06)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
15.04k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
20.95k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
8.57k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
21.71k (x2.42)
TOTAL
46.02k
66.27k (x1.44)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
94.36k (x4.1)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
141.73k (x3.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
69.38k (x6.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
32.72k (x2.2)
TOTAL
89.03k
338.19k (x3.8)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
16.04k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
24.47k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
8.38k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
21.66k (x2.79)
TOTAL
48.16k
70.55k (x1.46)
Multithread
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
113.63k (x2.9)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
143.55k (x3.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
63.84k (x7.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
27.34k (x2.49)
TOTAL
97.27k
348.35k (x3.58)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
5359 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4