Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 3.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 3.4 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
800f82
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
15.75k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
26.29k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
5.91k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
18.48k (x2.38)
TOTAL
48.16k
66.44k (x1.38)
Multithread
i7-7560U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
94.49k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
182.53k (x4.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
45.95k (x5.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
10.15k (x0.93)
TOTAL
97.27k
333.12k (x3.42)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4