| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs Ryzen 3 3250U


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3250U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the 3250U gets 77.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7560U is 1.2 times faster than the 3250U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Dali
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA1140-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
33.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
77.88k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
9.33k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
17.1k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
3.57k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
3.26k (x0.42)
TOTAL
48.16k
33.26k (x0.69)

Multithread

i7-7560U

3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
22.14k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
40.04k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
10.71k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
5k (x0.46)
TOTAL
97.27k
77.88k (x0.8)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
1476 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
2669 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
714 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
5192 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
3250U
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
2667 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
4886 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
932 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
9503 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4