Core i7-7560U vs FX 8320
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 8320 is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 89 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 89 k points while the 8320 gets 103.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
600f20
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Vishera
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/8
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
16.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
103.21k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
5.35k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
5.14k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
2.15k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
4.04k (x0.45)
TOTAL
46.02k
16.68k (x0.36)
Multithread
i7-7560U
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
36.79k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
40.2k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
19.57k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
6.66k (x0.45)
TOTAL
89.03k
103.21k (x1.16)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
1533 points/W
294 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
322 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
661 points/W
157 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/W
53 points/W
TOTAL
5935 points/W
826 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
8320
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
1339 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5268 points/GHz
1285 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1092 points/GHz
537 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1010 points/GHz
TOTAL
12111 points/GHz
4171 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4