| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs FX 6100


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 6100 is based on Bulldozer.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 89 k points while the 6100 gets 65.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7560U is 1.4 times faster than the 6100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
600f12
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Zambezi
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
3x64+6x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
3x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
20.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
65.32k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
7.15k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
6.53k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
2.55k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
4.2k (x0.47)
TOTAL
46.02k
20.42k (x0.44)

Multithread

i7-7560U

6100
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
24.5k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
23.85k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
13.45k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
3.51k (x0.24)
TOTAL
89.03k
65.32k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
1533 points/W
258 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
251 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
661 points/W
142 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
5935 points/W
688 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5268 points/GHz
1673 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1092 points/GHz
653 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
1077 points/GHz
TOTAL
12111 points/GHz
5235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4