| | | | | | |

Core i7-7560U vs A8 5500


Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 5500 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 89 k points while the 5500 gets 52.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7560U is 1.7 times faster than the 5500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
610f01
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Trinity
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+4x16 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2017
October 2012
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
22.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
52.13k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
8.61k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
7.28k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
3.1k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
3.27k (x0.36)
TOTAL
46.02k
22.25k (x0.48)

Multithread

i7-7560U

5500
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
19.76k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
18.75k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
9.5k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
4.11k (x0.28)
TOTAL
89.03k
52.13k (x0.59)

Performance/W
i7-7560U
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1533 points/W
304 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2747 points/W
289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
661 points/W
146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
994 points/W
63 points/W
TOTAL
5935 points/W
802 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3390 points/GHz
2326 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5268 points/GHz
1968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1092 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
883 points/GHz
TOTAL
12111 points/GHz
6014 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4