Core i7-7560U vs i9-13900K
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1847.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 19 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1847.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 19 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
b0671
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
2/4
24/32
TDP
15 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
36864 kB
Date
January 2017
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
132.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
1847.86k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.56k
9.77k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
12.71k
24.52k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.93k
17.17k (x4.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.89k
21.37k (x2.4)
TOTAL
29.09k
72.83k (x2.5)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6.34k
145.21k (x22.92)
Test#2 (FP)
29.51k
444.95k (x15.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.94k
318.3k (x35.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
27.2k (x1.85)
TOTAL
59.51k
935.66k (x15.72)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.78k
31.93k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
18.79k
31.54k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
18.8k (x3.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.95k
20.82k (x2.33)
TOTAL
45.24k
103.09k (x2.28)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
23.04k
522.07k (x22.66)
Test#2 (FP)
40.07k
584.17k (x14.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.08k
344.38k (x34.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.24k
25.36k (x1.66)
TOTAL
88.42k
1475.97k (x16.69)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.88k
31.8k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
32.83k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.15k
18.37k (x4.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.97k
21.13k (x2.36)
TOTAL
46.02k
104.13k (x2.26)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
23k
532.97k (x23.18)
Test#2 (FP)
41.21k
596.78k (x14.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.92k
342.96k (x34.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.9k
28.6k (x1.92)
TOTAL
89.03k
1501.31k (x16.86)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
60.21k (x3.11)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
33.14k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
17.81k (x4.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
21.18k (x2.73)
TOTAL
48.16k
132.34k (x2.75)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
861.66k (x22)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
626.76k (x16.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
334.12k (x37.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
25.33k (x2.31)
TOTAL
97.27k
1847.86k (x19)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
6893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
5014 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
2673 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
203 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
14783 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
10381 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5714 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
3071 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
3652 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
22818 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4