Core i7-7560U vs i7-11800H
Description
The i7-7560U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 6.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7560U gets a score of 97.3 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 6.2 times faster than the i7-7560U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806e9
806d1
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2017
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
48.16k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
97.27k points
607.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
19.37k
33.02k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
17.26k
26.55k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.78k
11.72k (x3.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.75k
17.06k (x2.2)
TOTAL
48.16k
88.34k (x1.83)
Multithread
i7-7560U
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
39.17k
260.97k (x6.66)
Test#2 (FP)
38.24k
248.94k (x6.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.9k
86.55k (x9.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.97k
10.91k (x0.99)
TOTAL
97.27k
607.38k (x6.24)
Performance/W
i7-7560U
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2611 points/W
5799 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2549 points/W
5532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
593 points/W
1923 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
731 points/W
242 points/W
TOTAL
6485 points/W
13497 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-7560U
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
5097 points/GHz
7177 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4543 points/GHz
5771 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
994 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2041 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
TOTAL
12674 points/GHz
19204 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4