| | | | | | |

Core i7-7500U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2


Description
The i7-7500U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7500U gets a score of 88.9 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 7.1 times faster than the i7-7500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
306e4
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/4
12 /24
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2016
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
48.67k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
86.94k points
633.14k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-7500U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.53k
3.44k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
14.67k
9.54k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.84k
4.21k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.26k
3.94k (x0.63)
TOTAL
29.29k
21.13k (x0.72)

Multithread

i7-7500U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
7.26k
73.17k (x10.07)
Test#2 (FP)
35.04k
230.83k (x6.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.28k
107.14k (x9.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.69k
7.99k (x1.4)
TOTAL
59.27k
419.12k (x7.07)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-7500U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.93k
10.64k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
9.53k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.03k
4.12k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.16k
3.62k (x0.59)
TOTAL
42.75k
27.91k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-7500U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
27.13k
252.69k (x9.31)
Test#2 (FP)
43.19k
238.68k (x5.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.7k
115.5k (x9.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.99k
10.98k (x2.2)
TOTAL
87.02k
617.84k (x7.1)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-7500U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.71k
10.53k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
18.61k
9.98k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
4k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.63k
3.4k (x0.51)
TOTAL
42.72k
27.92k (x0.65)

Multithread

i7-7500U

E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
27.27k
247.05k (x9.06)
Test#2 (FP)
44.7k
264.43k (x5.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.33k
111.01k (x9.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.55k
10.66k (x1.92)
TOTAL
88.86k
633.14k (x7.13)

Performance/W
i7-7500U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1818 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2980 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
755 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
370 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
5924 points/W
4870 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7500U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5316 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1365 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1895 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
12207 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4