| | | | | | |

Core i7-7500U vs m3-7Y30


Description
Both models i7-7500U and m3-7Y30 are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-7500U gets a score of 86.9 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7500U is 1.6 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
806e9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Kaby Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1356
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
48.67k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
86.94k points
52.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-7500U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
20.74k
10.02k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
9.22k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.98k
2.04k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.54k
4.31k (x0.78)
TOTAL
48.67k
25.6k (x0.53)

Multithread

i7-7500U

m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
37.34k
21.75k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
35.79k
20.51k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.34k
4.97k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
5.56k (x1.02)
TOTAL
86.94k
52.78k (x0.61)

Performance/W
i7-7500U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
2489 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2386 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
556 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
365 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
5796 points/W
11730 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-7500U
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
5926 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5260 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1137 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1584 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
13907 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4