Core i7-6900K vs Ryzen 7 4800HS
Description
The i7-6900K is based on Broadwell architecture while the 4800HS is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6900K gets a score of 427.5 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1 times faster than the i7-6900K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6900K gets a score of 427.5 k points while the 4800HS gets 427.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800HS is 1 times faster than the i7-6900K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
406f1
860f01
Core
Broadwell-E
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011-3
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
140 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
20480 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
September 2016
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
49.76k points
61.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.51k points
427.61k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6900K
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
23.11k
16.66k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
17.84k
26.01k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
9.31k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.47k
9.15k (x2.64)
TOTAL
49.76k
61.12k (x1.23)
Multithread
i7-6900K
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
184.19k
144.48k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
181.2k
192.46k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.44k
83.17k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
7.51k (x0.51)
TOTAL
427.51k
427.61k (x1)
Performance/W
i7-6900K
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
1316 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1294 points/W
5499 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
2376 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
105 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
3054 points/W
12218 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6900K
4800HS
Test#1 (Integers)
6247 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4822 points/GHz
6194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1444 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
938 points/GHz
2177 points/GHz
TOTAL
13450 points/GHz
14553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4