Core i7-6820HQ vs Xeon X5675
Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 152.1 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 152.1 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
206c2
Core
Skylake-H
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /12
TDP
45 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2015
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
8.77k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
5.82k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
3.47k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.27k
2.98k (x0.41)
TOTAL
40.01k
21.04k (x0.53)
Multithread
i7-6820HQ
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
48.5k
53.23k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
77.02k
39.35k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.3k
27.05k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.24k
5.28k (x1.01)
TOTAL
152.06k
124.92k (x0.82)
Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1078 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1711 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
473 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
116 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
3379 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3205 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4635 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1254 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2020 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
11114 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4