| | | | | | |

Core i7-6820HQ vs i7-10750H


Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10750H is 1.7 times faster than the i7-6820HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0652
Core
Skylake-H
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.18k
4.69k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
13.02k
18.71k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.17k
5.84k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.93k
13.95k (x2.01)
TOTAL
27.3k
43.19k (x1.58)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.26k
18.79k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
62.23k
86.1k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.34k
27.42k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
5.27k (x0.97)
TOTAL
101.29k
137.58k (x1.36)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.54k
16.63k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
16.69k
24.17k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
6.38k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.27k
13.69k (x1.88)
TOTAL
40.01k
60.87k (x1.52)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
48.5k
67.07k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
77.02k
107.95k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.3k
27.05k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.24k
5.07k (x0.97)
TOTAL
152.06k
207.14k (x1.36)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
11.78k
16.71k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
18.06k
25.45k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.48k
6.06k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.12k
13.2k (x1.85)
TOTAL
41.44k
61.43k (x1.48)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
49.46k
67.59k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
84.8k
111.94k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.7k
27.7k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.77k
5.3k (x1.11)
TOTAL
159.73k
212.53k (x1.33)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
29.06k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
26.49k (x1.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
6.23k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
13.89k (x2.26)
TOTAL
50.1k
75.67k (x1.51)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
154.61k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
151.34k (x1.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
36.33k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
6.93k (x1.1)
TOTAL
205.89k
349.21k (x1.7)

Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4