| | | | | | |

Core i7-6820HQ vs Athlon 3000G


Description
The i7-6820HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 3000G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6820HQ gets a score of 205.9 k points while the 3000G gets 95.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6820HQ is 2.1 times faster than the 3000G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2015
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.1k points
43.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.89k points
95.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6820HQ
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.99k
13.02k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
18.63k
20.56k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
4.81k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.15k
5.43k (x0.88)
TOTAL
50.1k
43.82k (x0.87)

Multithread

i7-6820HQ

3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
91.8k
27.29k (x0.3)
Test#2 (FP)
87.24k
49.37k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.55k
13.57k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.3k
5.61k (x0.89)
TOTAL
205.89k
95.84k (x0.47)

Performance/W
i7-6820HQ
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
2040 points/W
780 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1939 points/W
1411 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
457 points/W
388 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
140 points/W
160 points/W
TOTAL
4575 points/W
2738 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6820HQ
3000G
Test#1 (Integers)
5831 points/GHz
3719 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5174 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1204 points/GHz
1374 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1708 points/GHz
1553 points/GHz
TOTAL
13917 points/GHz
12519 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4