| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700K vs i5-10400F


Description
The i7-6700K is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700K gets a score of 254.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i7-6700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0653
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2015
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
63.22k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.56k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-6700K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.07k
4.3k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
16.62k
16.56k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
5.25k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.28k
12.61k (x2.01)
TOTAL
32.2k
38.72k (x1.2)

Multithread

i7-6700K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.37k
18.1k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
77.34k
79.16k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.65k
26.75k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.21k
13.81k (x1.35)
TOTAL
129.57k
137.82k (x1.06)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
25.78k
26.28k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
23.08k
23.38k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
5.52k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.03k
12.96k (x1.44)
TOTAL
63.22k
68.14k (x1.08)

Multithread

i7-6700K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
112.83k
163.67k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
106.86k
159.74k (x1.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.76k
39k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.12k
7.56k (x0.83)
TOTAL
254.56k
369.97k (x1.45)

Performance/W
i7-6700K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1188 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1125 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
2680 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6139 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5495 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2150 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
15052 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4