Core i7-6700K vs i5-10200H
Description
The i7-6700K is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700K gets a score of 254.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1 times faster than the i7-6700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700K gets a score of 254.6 k points while the i5-10200H gets 260.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 1 times faster than the i7-6700K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
a0652
Core
Skylake-S
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2015
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
63.22k points
67.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.56k points
260.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
25.78k
26.37k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
23.08k
23.91k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
5.57k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.03k
11.68k (x1.29)
TOTAL
63.22k
67.53k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-6700K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
112.83k
114.08k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
106.86k
114.71k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.76k
27.33k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.12k
4.25k (x0.47)
TOTAL
254.56k
260.38k (x1.02)
Performance/W
i7-6700K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
1188 points/W
3259 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1125 points/W
3277 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
781 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
2680 points/W
7439 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6700K
i5-10200H
Test#1 (Integers)
6139 points/GHz
6433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5495 points/GHz
5831 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1358 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2150 points/GHz
2848 points/GHz
TOTAL
15052 points/GHz
16470 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4