Core i7-6700K vs Ryzen 5 3400G
Description
The i7-6700K is based on Skylake architecture while the 3400G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700K gets a score of 254.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700K is 1.3 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700K gets a score of 254.6 k points while the 3400G gets 200.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-6700K is 1.3 times faster than the 3400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2015
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
63.22k points
50.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
254.56k points
200.34k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
25.78k
14.58k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
23.08k
23.98k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.32k
5.35k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.03k
6.34k (x0.7)
TOTAL
63.22k
50.25k (x0.79)
Multithread
i7-6700K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
112.83k
57.37k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
106.86k
107.03k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.76k
28.9k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.12k
7.05k (x0.77)
TOTAL
254.56k
200.34k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i7-6700K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1188 points/W
883 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1125 points/W
1647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
271 points/W
445 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
96 points/W
108 points/W
TOTAL
2680 points/W
3082 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6700K
3400G
Test#1 (Integers)
6139 points/GHz
3471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5495 points/GHz
5710 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2150 points/GHz
1509 points/GHz
TOTAL
15052 points/GHz
11965 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4