| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700HQ vs i5-3470


Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-3470 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 145.7 k points while the i5-3470 gets 94.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 1.5 times faster than the i5-3470 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306a9
Core
Skylake-H
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
31.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
94.15k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
11.51k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
16.98k
11.12k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
4.44k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
4.64k (x0.66)
TOTAL
39.49k
31.71k (x0.8)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
44.59k
37.93k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
75.02k
36.37k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.15k
14.14k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
5.71k (x0.97)
TOTAL
145.68k
94.15k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
991 points/W
493 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/W
472 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
184 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
3237 points/W
1223 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
3208 points/GHz
3196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4853 points/GHz
3090 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
1234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2021 points/GHz
1289 points/GHz
TOTAL
11284 points/GHz
8809 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4