| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700HQ vs i5-1035G4


Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
706e5
Core
Skylake-H
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
45 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
142.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
13.9k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
16.98k
20.13k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
9.41k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
10.59k (x1.5)
TOTAL
39.49k
54.03k (x1.37)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
44.59k
55.4k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
75.02k
59.01k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.15k
22.83k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
6.7k (x1.13)
TOTAL
145.68k
143.94k (x0.99)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.33k
25.53k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
18.34k
19.99k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
9.31k (x2.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.44k
10.81k (x1.68)
TOTAL
50.54k
65.64k (x1.3)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
91.89k
58.46k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
87.87k
57.31k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.61k
20.1k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.87k
6.81k (x1.4)
TOTAL
205.24k
142.69k (x0.7)

Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
2042 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
458 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
4561 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6094 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1840 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4