| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700HQ vs i3-4160


Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-4160 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 145.7 k points while the i3-4160 gets 74 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 2 times faster than the i3-4160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
306c3
Core
Skylake-H
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
45 W
54 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
3072 kB
Date
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
34.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
74k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
13.02k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
16.98k
12k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
4.91k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
4.23k (x0.6)
TOTAL
39.49k
34.16k (x0.86)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
44.59k
27.45k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
75.02k
28.96k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.15k
11.83k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
5.77k (x0.97)
TOTAL
145.68k
74k (x0.51)

Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
991 points/W
508 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1667 points/W
536 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
448 points/W
219 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
131 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
3237 points/W
1370 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
i3-4160
Test#1 (Integers)
3208 points/GHz
3616 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4853 points/GHz
3334 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1203 points/GHz
1363 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2021 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
TOTAL
11284 points/GHz
9488 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4