Core i7-6700HQ vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 2.1 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 2.1 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
860f01
Core
Skylake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.33k
16.59k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
18.34k
23.51k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
9.38k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.44k
7.98k (x1.24)
TOTAL
50.54k
57.47k (x1.14)
Multithread
i7-6700HQ
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
91.89k
152.43k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
87.87k
195.79k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.61k
83.2k (x4.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.87k
5.38k (x1.11)
TOTAL
205.24k
436.8k (x2.13)
Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
2042 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
458 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
4561 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6094 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1840 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4