Core i7-6700HQ vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.6 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4600H is 1.6 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
860f01
Core
Skylake-H
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
21.33k
15.48k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
18.34k
22.82k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
8.63k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.44k
7.17k (x1.11)
TOTAL
50.54k
54.11k (x1.07)
Multithread
i7-6700HQ
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
91.89k
117.98k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
87.87k
146.43k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.61k
65.54k (x3.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.87k
4.77k (x0.98)
TOTAL
205.24k
334.72k (x1.63)
Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
2042 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
458 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
4561 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6094 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1840 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4