| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700HQ vs Ryzen 5 3500X


Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 3500X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the 3500X gets 373.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3500X is 1.8 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
870f10
Core
Skylake-H
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
32768 kB
Date
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
66.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
373.61k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
21.33k
15.48k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
18.34k
22.91k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
7.1k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.44k
21.11k (x3.28)
TOTAL
50.54k
66.61k (x1.32)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
91.89k
90.39k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
87.87k
139.1k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.61k
53.2k (x2.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.87k
90.92k (x18.68)
TOTAL
205.24k
373.61k (x1.82)

Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
2042 points/W
1391 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
2140 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
458 points/W
818 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
1399 points/W
TOTAL
4561 points/W
5748 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
3500X
Test#1 (Integers)
6094 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
5588 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1732 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1840 points/GHz
5149 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
16246 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4