| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700HQ vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.4 times faster than the i7-6700HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
800f82
Core
Skylake-H
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
291.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
21.33k
13.76k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
18.34k
23.03k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
5.12k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.44k
15.23k (x2.36)
TOTAL
50.54k
57.13k (x1.13)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
91.89k
83.23k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
87.87k
161.06k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.61k
40.52k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.87k
6.73k (x1.38)
TOTAL
205.24k
291.53k (x1.42)

Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2042 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
458 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
4561 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6094 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1840 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4