| | | | | | |

Core i7-6700HQ vs Ryzen 3 3200G


Description
The i7-6700HQ is based on Skylake architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-6700HQ gets a score of 205.2 k points while the 3200G gets 168.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-6700HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-H
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA1440
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
4096 kB
Date
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
50.54k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
205.24k points
168.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
11.23k
13.05k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
16.98k
22.88k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.21k
5.39k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.07k
7.31k (x1.03)
TOTAL
39.49k
48.63k (x1.23)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
44.59k
51.73k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
75.02k
87.74k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.15k
20.74k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.92k
6.57k (x1.11)
TOTAL
145.68k
166.79k (x1.14)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-6700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
21.33k
14.48k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
18.34k
23.84k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.44k
5.43k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.44k
5.46k (x0.85)
TOTAL
50.54k
49.21k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-6700HQ

3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
91.89k
54.39k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
87.87k
88.77k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.61k
20.04k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.87k
5.48k (x1.13)
TOTAL
205.24k
168.69k (x0.82)

Performance/W
i7-6700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
2042 points/W
837 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1953 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
458 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
108 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4561 points/W
2595 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-6700HQ
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
6094 points/GHz
3619 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5240 points/GHz
5961 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1267 points/GHz
1357 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1840 points/GHz
1365 points/GHz
TOTAL
14441 points/GHz
12302 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4